After constructing a female-ruled village, a village of beautiful girls are discovering that men doesn't stick around with them. And they wonder why. Can someone educate these people a couple of fundamental things?
Males of human beings, in their own very genes, are nomadic, brutal and playful. Given an option, they would just want to break any chains (physical & social) and be on their own. Please don't take your female genes as the foundation to understand what males of your own species are constituted of. If you have any doubts, have some babies and see how the boys play with their toys. And watch them grow. Their toys change. From small cars, small trucks, small guns & small devices to...big cars, big trucks, big guns & big devices...to real cars, to real trucks , real guns & real devices. The size & nature of toys change. But the toys remain. They play. And they love to play to their own rules. From mother's lap till their deathbed. If you don't give them that space to play, they are not going to stick for a long time. Females play for time pass. Males take rest for time pass during the play (and watch sports in TV when they are taking rest).
Marriage as an institution, is a method to tie men to their families and communities and channel their playful & fierce energy into productive use of mankind (You might have heard the feminists wailing that marriage is invented to chain females. Well, they can't get more wrong than that). Without marriage and family, men will merrily go around and do their own things. With no care. Lifelong. With no boredom whatsoever. But, if you tie them to yourself, allow them an incentive to stick to your families. And that incentive is the room to play to his own rules. Don't look at a society that men created by his own rules and think that you can build a similar society, but without his rules. It could work in a family or in a village (that's what I was thinking, but it seems it may not even work in a village), but not in a very large community. You can surely build on own your own, but it won't look the same for sure. And then don't come around asking WHY?
Males of human beings, in their own very genes, are nomadic, brutal and playful. Given an option, they would just want to break any chains (physical & social) and be on their own. Please don't take your female genes as the foundation to understand what males of your own species are constituted of. If you have any doubts, have some babies and see how the boys play with their toys. And watch them grow. Their toys change. From small cars, small trucks, small guns & small devices to...big cars, big trucks, big guns & big devices...to real cars, to real trucks , real guns & real devices. The size & nature of toys change. But the toys remain. They play. And they love to play to their own rules. From mother's lap till their deathbed. If you don't give them that space to play, they are not going to stick for a long time. Females play for time pass. Males take rest for time pass during the play (and watch sports in TV when they are taking rest).
Marriage as an institution, is a method to tie men to their families and communities and channel their playful & fierce energy into productive use of mankind (You might have heard the feminists wailing that marriage is invented to chain females. Well, they can't get more wrong than that). Without marriage and family, men will merrily go around and do their own things. With no care. Lifelong. With no boredom whatsoever. But, if you tie them to yourself, allow them an incentive to stick to your families. And that incentive is the room to play to his own rules. Don't look at a society that men created by his own rules and think that you can build a similar society, but without his rules. It could work in a family or in a village (that's what I was thinking, but it seems it may not even work in a village), but not in a very large community. You can surely build on own your own, but it won't look the same for sure. And then don't come around asking WHY?
No comments:
Post a Comment